I write across several niches and I am pretty convinced I can be of great help with your project.
As you can see from my reviews, I do my job really well and deliver in good time.
Here is some part of a project I recently completed
B. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE METHODOLOGIES
The classification of offenders in different levels of prison can and should be a good thing except that mostly, the entire time is spent reminding these offenders of their supposed bad sides. When treated like animals, you expect people to act like animals. Extremes are reached and lines crossed. A lot of offenders are reminded, on a consistent basis, and by the officers that are meant to help with reforming them, just how horrible they are. They are picked on, given unsavoury nicknames and offensive language is a major means of communication. The main aim of the prison system is defeated. The people are suddenly thrust and engrained into a broken lifestyle, one where they are told, directly and indirectly, to not trust themselves.
The supposed aim of strict sentencing policies, according to the government, was to reduce crime and improve community life. It is now apparent, however, that neither policymakers nor the justice system anticipated how putting so many people in prison would damage the lives, families and communities from which they were removed. Maybe mass imprisonment has incarcerated many who would have a negative effect on the general society, but it has also removed thousands of people who have had a positive effect on the economy, families, and the community as a whole. Several communities now face economic hardship, family disruption, and more crime due to high levels of incarceration. Research has shown that while incarceration reduces crime at moderate levels, it begins to increase crime rates when they reach a tipping point.
High levels of incarceration will not lead to less crime as communities with the highest levels of incarceration are actually weakened by the very thing that is supposed to make them safer. The research mentioned above supports the claim that high levels of incarceration increases risk by reducing social and neighbourhood capital. Even if an offender, despite the highly discouraging circumstances, want to change for the better, there is little or no support. The incentive to do good or become better is missing and evidentially, it affects the high rate of returned offenders after their first imprisonment.